lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/9] block: implement bio_associate_current()
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:06:42PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 02:16:04PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:01:28AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > Yeah, AFAICS, if the cloning task hasn't issued IO before, CLONE_IO is
> > > ignored.
> >
> > Will it make sense to try to allocate and attach io_context and then
> > share it in copy_io()?
>
> Yeap, that's probably what we should do on CLONE_IO.
>
> > Well, you are planning to kill CLONE_IO altogether, so it does not
> > make a difference.
>
> Heh, I was just thinking about sending out a RFC patch. I mean,
> CLONE_IO handling that severely broken and nobody noticing for such
> long time doesn't look good, right?

Yep, it definitely raises the question that how many users are out
there.

Thanks
Vivek


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-20 22:13    [W:0.061 / U:0.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site