[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels
    On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Ted Ts'o <> wrote:
    > Perf was IMHO an overreaction caused by the fact that systemtap and
    > oprofile people packaged and released the sources in a way that kernel
    > developers didn't like.
    > I don't think perf should be used as a precendent that now argues that
    > any new kernel utility should be moved into the kernel sources.  Does
    > it make sense to move all of mount, fsck, login, etc., into the kernel
    > sources?  There are far more kernel tools outside of the kernel
    > sources than inside the kernel sources.

    There's two overlapping questions here:

    (1) Does it make sense to merge the KVM tool to Linux kernel tree?

    (2) Does it make sense to merge userspace tools to the kernel tree?

    I'm not trying to use perf to justify merging the KVM tool. However, you
    seem to be arguing that it shouldn't be merged because merging
    userspace tools in general doesn't make sense. That's why I brought up
    the situation with perf.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-11-07 14:01    [W:0.040 / U:62.312 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site