lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][v7][PATCH 0/9] Implement clone2() system call


Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> === NEW CLONE() SYSTEM CALL:
>
> To support application checkpoint/restart, a task must have the same pid it
> had when it was checkpointed. When containers are nested, the tasks within
> the containers exist in multiple pid namespaces and hence have multiple pids
> to specify during restart.
>
> This patchset implements a new system call, clone2() that lets a process
> specify the pids of the child process.
>
> Patches 1 through 6 are helper patches, needed for choosing a pid for the
> child process.
>
> Patch 8 defines a prototype of the new system call. Patch 9 adds some
> documentation on the new system call, some/all of which will eventually
> go into a man page.
>

[...]

>
> Based on these requirements and constraints, we explored a couple of system
> call interfaces (in earlier versions of this patchset) and currently define
> the system call as:
>
> struct clone_struct {
> u64 flags;
> u64 child_stack;
> u32 nr_pids;
> u32 parent_tid;
> u32 child_tid;

So @parent_tid and @child_tid are pointers to userspace memory and
require 'u64' (and it won't hurt to make @reserved1 a 'u64' as well).

> u32 reserved1;
> u64 reserved2;
> };
>

Also, for forward/backward compatibility, explicitly state in the
documentation, and enforce in the kernel, that flags which are not
defined must not be set, and that reserved{1,2} must remain 0.
> sys_clone2(struct clone_struct __user *cs, pid_t __user *pids)
>
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Otherwise, looks great.

Oren.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-24 19:47    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans