Messages in this thread | | | From | Chris Mason <> | Subject | Re: Btrfs v0.14 Released | Date | Fri, 2 May 2008 10:34:07 -0400 |
| |
On Friday 02 May 2008, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
[ Btrfs oops with apparmor patched in ]
> Make is not my forte, but here is a working test to see if apparmor > exists in Ubuntu 8.04. > Maybe have make apply a patch to the btrfs source if this test > succeeds? Does this work in SUSE? > > http://www.digitalprognosis.com/opensource/patches/btrfs/lame_apparmor_test >_for_btrfs.patch >
Thanks, but this uses CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR which isn't enough to tell if the kernel has the patch. Lets go back to Jeff's suse patch:
/* * Even if AppArmor isn't enabled, it still has different prototypes. * Add more distro/version pairs here to declare which has AppArmor applied. */ #if defined(CONFIG_SUSE_KERNEL) # if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,22) # define REMOVE_SUID_PATH 1 # endif #endif
Could someone from Ubuntu please suggest a replacement for CONFIG_SUSE_KERNEL and KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,22) that would correspond with ubuntu kernels shipped with apparmor? We don't need some define from the apparmor patch, just a global flag that says it comes from ubuntu is enough.
-chris
| |