lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Btrfs v0.14 Released
    Date
    On Friday 02 May 2008, Jeff Schroeder wrote:

    [ Btrfs oops with apparmor patched in ]

    > Make is not my forte, but here is a working test to see if apparmor
    > exists in Ubuntu 8.04.
    > Maybe have make apply a patch to the btrfs source if this test
    > succeeds? Does this work in SUSE?
    >
    > http://www.digitalprognosis.com/opensource/patches/btrfs/lame_apparmor_test
    >_for_btrfs.patch
    >

    Thanks, but this uses CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR which isn't enough to tell if
    the kernel has the patch. Lets go back to Jeff's suse patch:

    /*
    * Even if AppArmor isn't enabled, it still has different prototypes.
    * Add more distro/version pairs here to declare which has AppArmor applied.
    */
    #if defined(CONFIG_SUSE_KERNEL)
    # if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,22)
    # define REMOVE_SUID_PATH 1
    # endif
    #endif

    Could someone from Ubuntu please suggest a replacement for CONFIG_SUSE_KERNEL
    and KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,22) that would correspond with ubuntu kernels shipped
    with apparmor? We don't need some define from the apparmor patch, just a
    global flag that says it comes from ubuntu is enough.

    -chris


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-05-02 16:37    [W:0.021 / U:29.780 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site