Messages in this thread | | | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] mm: BadRAM support for broken memory | Date | Mon, 3 Mar 2008 16:32:47 +1100 |
| |
On Monday 03 March 2008 04:01, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Hi > > in general, > Agreed with we need bad memory treatness. > > > +#define PG_badram 20 /* BadRam page */ > > some architecture use PG_reserved for treat bad memory. > Why do you want introduce new page flag? > for show_mem() improvement?
I'd like to get rid of PG_reserved at some point. So I'd rather not overload it with more meanings ;)
| |