[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.6.24] mm: BadRAM support for broken memory
Hello Kosaki,

> in general,
> Agreed with we need bad memory treatness.

Glad to hear that.

> > +#define PG_badram 20 /* BadRam page */
> some architecture use PG_reserved for treat bad memory.
> Why do you want introduce new page flag?

It is clearer to properly name a flag, I suppose.
Is the use that you are mentioning the intended, and only use of the flag?
If not, I think it is clearer to use a separate flag instead of overloading

> for show_mem() improvement?

For code clarity.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-02 18:45    [W:0.105 / U:2.720 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site