[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.6.24] mm: BadRAM support for broken memory

    > This is a great feature for those of us who value their money more
    > than a few hours of time as well. :-)

    That's how it's most often used, indeed. I do value the environmental
    aspect as well: the potential for memory manufacturers (say, for the
    $100 laptop) to ship out their broken memories at a low cost, thereby
    delivering more products for a given amount of toxic waste created in
    the chip etching process.

    > I would very much like to see this patch in mainline

    Many, many people want to. I've been asked about it a lot, but always
    lacked the time to figure out how.

    > ISTR that one
    > argument that has been historically made against this sort of thing is
    > that it would make bug reports unreliable.

    Actually it's broken memory that makes reports unreliable, not the patch :)

    After the right set of broken addresses has been applied, the whole system
    runs as reliably as any other system. And I hope people have the wits to
    mistrust a system for a while after they've plugged in broken DIMMs ;-)

    > mechanism now, so that shouldn't be a showstopper -- if that's the
    > only argument, then set a new taint flag, please.

    I doubt that'll be necessary, but yes, it'd be a way out. Thanks.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-03-02 20:37    [W:0.020 / U:4.804 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site