Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:36:28 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation |
| |
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:31:55 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> So I shall drop git-sched again.
And when I do this I get:
*************** *** 8125,8137 **** return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, nbytes, ppos, tmp, len); } - static int cpu_rt_period_write_uint(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cftype, u64 rt_period_us) { return sched_group_set_rt_period(cgroup_tg(cgrp), rt_period_us); } - static u64 cpu_rt_period_read_uint(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft) { return sched_group_rt_period(cgroup_tg(cgrp)); } --- 8125,8137 ---- return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, nbytes, ppos, tmp, len); } + static int cpu_rt_period_write_u64(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cftype, u64 rt_period_us) { return sched_group_set_rt_period(cgroup_tg(cgrp), rt_period_us); } + static u64 cpu_rt_period_read_u64(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft) { return sched_group_rt_period(cgroup_tg(cgrp)); } *************** *** 8367,8374 **** }, { .name = "rt_period_us", - .read_uint = cpu_rt_period_read_uint, - .write_uint = cpu_rt_period_write_uint, }, #endif }; --- 8367,8374 ---- }, { .name = "rt_period_us", + .read_u64 = cpu_rt_period_read_u64, + .write_u64 = cpu_rt_period_write_u64, }, #endif };
and if I then fix that up, and later restore git-sched, Paul's patch is now broken.
Your trees continue to cause more trouble than anyone else's have ever done, by a lot.
Let me try yesterday's git-sched.patch.
| |