Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23] | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Date | Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:08:44 +0200 |
| |
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 13:45 -0400, Daniel Hazelton wrote: > On Friday 27 July 2007 06:25:18 Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 03:00 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > So hrm. Are we sure that updatedb is the problem? There are quite a few > > > heavyweight things which happen in the wee small hours. > > > > The balance in _my_ world seems just fine. I don't let any of those > > system maintenance things run while I'm using the system, and it doesn't > > bother me if my working set has to be reconstructed after heavy-weight > > maintenance things are allowed to run. I'm not seeing anything I > > wouldn't expect to see when running a job the size of updatedb. > > > > -Mike > > Do you realize you've totally missed the point?
Did you notice that I didn't make one disparaging remark about the patch or the concept behind it? Did you notice that I took _my time_ to test, to actually look at the problem? No, you're too busy running your mouth to appreciate the efforts of others.
<snips load of useless spleen venting>
Do yourself a favor, go dig into the VM source. Read it, understand it (not terribly easy), _then_ come back and preach to me.
Have a nice day.
-Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |