[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 13:45 -0400, Daniel Hazelton wrote:
> On Friday 27 July 2007 06:25:18 Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 03:00 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > > So hrm. Are we sure that updatedb is the problem? There are quite a few
> > > heavyweight things which happen in the wee small hours.
> >
> > The balance in _my_ world seems just fine. I don't let any of those
> > system maintenance things run while I'm using the system, and it doesn't
> > bother me if my working set has to be reconstructed after heavy-weight
> > maintenance things are allowed to run. I'm not seeing anything I
> > wouldn't expect to see when running a job the size of updatedb.
> >
> > -Mike
> Do you realize you've totally missed the point?

Did you notice that I didn't make one disparaging remark about the patch
or the concept behind it? Did you notice that I took _my time_ to
test, to actually look at the problem? No, you're too busy running
your mouth to appreciate the efforts of others.

<snips load of useless spleen venting>

Do yourself a favor, go dig into the VM source. Read it, understand it
(not terribly easy), _then_ come back and preach to me.

Have a nice day.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-28 00:13    [W:0.357 / U:2.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site