[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
On 07/27/2007 09:43 PM, wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Rene Herman wrote:
>> On 07/27/2007 07:45 PM, Daniel Hazelton wrote:
>>> Questions about it:
>>> Q) Does swap-prefetch help with this?
>>> A) [From all reports I've seen (*)]
>>> Yes, it does.
>> No it does not. If updatedb filled memory to the point of causing
>> swapping (which noone is reproducing anyway) it HAS FILLED MEMORY and
>> swap-prefetch hasn't any memory to prefetch into -- updatedb itself
>> doesn't use any significant memory.
> however there are other programs which are known to take up significant
> amounts of memory and will cause the issue being described (openoffice
> for example)
> please don't get hung up on the text 'updatedb' and accept that there
> are programs that do run intermittently and do use a significant amount
> of ram and then free it.

Different issue. One that's worth pursueing perhaps, but a different issue
from the VFS caches issue that people have been trying to track down.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-28 09:25    [W:0.350 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site