[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [rfc 00/45] [RFC] CPU ops and a rework of per cpu data handling on x86_64

> Although we have a per-cpu area base in a fixed global register
> for addressing, the above isn't beneficial on sparc64 because
> the atomic is much slower than doing a:
> local_irq_disable();
> nonatomic_percpu_memory_op();
> local_irq_enable();

Again might be pointing out the obvious, but you
need of course save_flags()/restore_flags(), not disable/enable().

If it was just disable/enable x86 could do it much faster too
and Christoph probably would never felt the need to approach
this project for his SLUB fast path.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-20 04:33    [W:0.260 / U:6.520 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site