Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 8 Jul 2006 01:18:24 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability |
| |
On Fri 2006-07-07 20:03:08, Olivier Galibert wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:50:31PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > > I know users that installed swsusp, decided they want progress bars, > > and went for suspend2. > > I know users that installed swsusp, decided they wanted working > suspend, and brought a mac. > > > > Nigel only submitted his code once, month or so ago, as series of 200 > > or so patches. Do not blame me for _that_. > > Nigel submitted his code on 2004-09-16, 2004-11-24, 2005-07-05, > 2006-01-25, 2006-03-28 and 2006-06-26.
Lets check for example 2006-03-28...
No... this is not submission of suspend2. It is info that new version of it is available, with only url (!) of .tar.bz2 (!) given. With no signed-off-by: headers, no patches, no changelogs.
Read relevant documentation if you want to know how patch submission looks. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |