[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Slimming down struct inode
Nathan Scott wrote:
> Such a change would would indeed break XFS, in exactly the way you
> suggest Jan - the realtime subvolume does typically use a different
> blocksize from the data subvolume (the realtime extent size is used,
> and this can be set per-inode too), and there would now be no way to
> distinguish this preferred IO size difference.

It can be made into an inode operation:

if (inode->i_ops->getblksize)
return inode->i_ops->getblksize(inode);
return inode->i_sb->s_blksize;

Trading some efficiency for space.

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-13 16:03    [W:0.090 / U:1.548 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site