[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Slimming down struct inode
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 05:00:59PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Such a change would would indeed break XFS, in exactly the way you

Oh, I should clarify - the suggestion of using sb->s_blocksize/
s_blocksize_bits was what I meant by "would break XFS".

> > suggest Jan - the realtime subvolume does typically use a different
> > blocksize from the data subvolume (the realtime extent size is used,
> > and this can be set per-inode too), and there would now be no way to
> > distinguish this preferred IO size difference.
> It can be made into an inode operation:

*nod* - that'd work fine for our needs here.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-14 00:44    [W:0.072 / U:4.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site