lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[patch 30/30] CIFS: New POSIX locking code not setting rc properly to zero on successful
-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>

unlock in case where server does not support POSIX locks and nobrl is
not specified.

Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
---
fs/cifs/file.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index e9c5ba9..ddb012a 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -752,6 +752,7 @@ int cifs_lock(struct file *file, int cmd
int stored_rc = 0;
struct cifsLockInfo *li, *tmp;

+ rc = 0;
down(&fid->lock_sem);
list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &fid->llist, llist) {
if (pfLock->fl_start <= li->offset &&
@@ -766,7 +767,7 @@ int cifs_lock(struct file *file, int cmd
kfree(li);
}
}
- up(&fid->lock_sem);
+ up(&fid->lock_sem);
}
}

--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-11-16 03:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans