Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6 | Date | Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:22:16 +1000 |
| |
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:16, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > On 8/21/05, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:34, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Hi > > > > > here are kernbench results: > > > > Nice to see you using kernbench :) > > > > > ./kernbench -M -o 128 > > > [..] > > > Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run: > > > > Was there any reason you chose 128? Optimal usually works out > > automatically from kernbench to 4x number_cpus. If I recall correctly you > > have 4 cpus? Not sure what 128 represents. > > > > Cheers, > > Con > > No, I just have 1 pentium 4 with ht ;). > > Why I chose 128? I just want very high loads. Now I'll try -j192 and > -j256, but I don't know how does my system survive it.
Well it will survive all right, but eventually get into swap thrash territory and that's not a meaningful cpu scheduler benchmark.
Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |