lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
Hi,

On 8/21/05, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:34, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi
>
> > here are kernbench results:
>
> Nice to see you using kernbench :)
>
> > ./kernbench -M -o 128
> > [..]
> > Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run:
>
> Was there any reason you chose 128? Optimal usually works out automatically
> from kernbench to 4x number_cpus. If I recall correctly you have 4 cpus? Not
> sure what 128 represents.
>
> Cheers,
> Con
>

No, I just have 1 pentium 4 with ht ;).

Why I chose 128? I just want very high loads. Now I'll try -j192 and
-j256, but I don't know how does my system survive it.

Regards,
Michal Piotrowski
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-21 06:19    [W:0.057 / U:1.324 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site