Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 Aug 2005 06:16:17 +0200 | From | Michal Piotrowski <> | Subject | Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6 |
| |
Hi,
On 8/21/05, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote: > On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:34, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi > > > here are kernbench results: > > Nice to see you using kernbench :) > > > ./kernbench -M -o 128 > > [..] > > Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run: > > Was there any reason you chose 128? Optimal usually works out automatically > from kernbench to 4x number_cpus. If I recall correctly you have 4 cpus? Not > sure what 128 represents. > > Cheers, > Con >
No, I just have 1 pentium 4 with ht ;).
Why I chose 128? I just want very high loads. Now I'll try -j192 and -j256, but I don't know how does my system survive it.
Regards, Michal Piotrowski - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |