Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6 | Date | Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:49:38 +1000 |
| |
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:44, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > On 8/21/05, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote: > > Well it will survive all right, but eventually get into swap thrash > > territory and that's not a meaningful cpu scheduler benchmark. > > > > Cheers, > > Con > > Ok. How about make -j? It's one of kernbench test runs, on my box load > average > 1500 ;).
Just do that if you wish to overload the system. It's a vm benchmark. No doubt the cpu scheduler contributes to how the vm behaves, but it isn't a primary cpu scheduler test.
> BTW I have only 1 gb ram, so high values of -j are road to hell for my > system... I'm still learning, but it's fun ;). Now I'll try your latest > -ck. Thanks for "1Gb Low Memory Support".
You're welcome, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |