lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition


    On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
    >
    > > The fact is, 0 _is_ special. Not just for hardware, but because 0 has a
    > > magical meaning as "false" in the C language.
    >
    > I don't agree, irq 0 has been a valid irq on a number of platforms for
    > ages

    The point is, it's _not_ a valid irq for 99.9% of all machines and drivers
    that have ever been tested.

    Also, if you don't agree that 0 is special in the C language, then you're
    just strictly _wrong_. It's an undeniable fact that zero _is_ special.

    Linus
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.037 / U:122.076 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site