[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition
Ingo Molnar writes:

> is there any architecture where irq 0 is a legitimate setting that could
> occur in drivers, and which would make NO_IRQ define of 0 non-practical?

Yes, G5 powermacs have the SATA controller on irq 0. So if we can't
use irq 0, I can't get to my hard disk. :) Other powermacs also use
irq 0 for various things, as do embedded PPC machines.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-21 22:28    [W:0.211 / U:3.480 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site