lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: network / performance problems

On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Ron Peterson wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Ron Peterson wrote:
>
> > I've also added some graphs of must monitoring mist (which is the machine
> > I actually care about the most right now). Mist ping latencies are
> > predictably on the upswing again. I'll likely be rebooting soon.
> >
> > http://depot.mtholyoke.edu:8080/tmp/must-mist/2002-02-24_8:40/
>
> I've had to turn my attention to some other responsibilities, so I haven't
> done any kernel profiling yet. However, I can report that I rebooted
> 'mist' into 2.4.20 yesterday, and I have seen rock solid .15 ms response
> times for more than 24 hours. Host 'must' is likewise now stable, running
> 2.4.20 for two days now. I have graphs, logs, etc. if anyone cares to see
> them.

These machines remain very stable at 2.4.20.

I don't know where things currently stand vis-a-vis knowing what's
causing this network/system load creep problem, but I thought I'd report
that I installed 2.4.21 on a single processor about a week ago (1GHz PIII,
500MB, Intel 82820 (ICH2) Chipset w/ eepro100 module), and am seeing the
same bad behaviour. I have very clear graphs, if that's useful, but
haven't been logging system stats as aggressively as on some other
machines.

So something between 2.4.20 and 2.4.21, I think. I wish I could be more
helpfull..

_________________________
Ron Peterson
Network & Systems Manager
Mount Holyoke College

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:1.066 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site