Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:01:20 +0200 (CEST) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: 2.6 bug: kconfig implementation doesn't match the spec |
| |
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > You probably forgot to set MODULES, tristate behaves like bool in this > > case and FOO becomes 'y' and '!FOO' is 'n'. > > No, this is with CONFIG_MODULES=y.
How did you set it? I tried your examples and got the expected and correct result.
> According to your language definition, > m && !m > evaluates to "m" (it sounds a bit strange but follows directly from > rules (5) and (7) together with the interpretation of "m" as 1 as > explained in the section "Menu dependencies" of > Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt).
BTW the reason for (5) !<expr> -> 2-<expr> is that it becomes possible to do various transformations with the expressions, e.g. !!<expr> == <expr>.
bye, Roman
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |