[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6 bug: kconfig implementation doesn't match the spec

On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> > You probably forgot to set MODULES, tristate behaves like bool in this
> > case and FOO becomes 'y' and '!FOO' is 'n'.
> No, this is with CONFIG_MODULES=y.

How did you set it? I tried your examples and got the expected and correct

> According to your language definition,
> m && !m
> evaluates to "m" (it sounds a bit strange but follows directly from
> rules (5) and (7) together with the interpretation of "m" as 1 as
> explained in the section "Menu dependencies" of
> Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt).

BTW the reason for (5) !<expr> -> 2-<expr> is that it becomes possible to
do various transformations with the expressions, e.g. !!<expr> == <expr>.

bye, Roman

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.071 / U:4.720 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site