[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Interactivity improvements
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 16:26, Patrick McLean wrote:

> Finally, the interactivity estimator seems to be quite a bit of code,
> which certain people have no real useful (in servers for example) and I
> would imagine that it does reduce throughput, which is not a big deal in
> desktops, but in a server environment it's not good, so maybe a
> CONFIG_INTERACTIVE_ESTIMATOR or something similar would be an idea to
> keep the server people happy, just have an option to completely get rid
> of the extra overhead of having a really nice interactivity estimator. I
> could be an idiot though, and I imagine that I will be needing some
> asbestos for saying this, but I thought I would voice my opinion.

In the past, I proposed to have at least 2 schedulers available (much
like we have for I/O schedulers): one for servers, which doesn't mess
with bonuses and interactivity too much and gives best throughput for
batch processing (OLTP and in general, non-interactive loads), and
another one for desktops or Terminal Servers.

Don't know if this is feasible, however.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.050 / U:0.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site