[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] O10int for interactivity
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:21, Timothy Miller wrote:
> wrote:
> > I'm guessing that the anticipatory scheduler is the culprit here. Soon
> > as I figure out the incantations to use the deadline scheduler, I'll
> > report back....
> It would be unfortunate if AS and the interactivity scheduler were to
> conflict. Is there a way we can have them talk to each other and have
> AS boost some I/O requests for tasks which are marked as interactive?
> It would sacrifice some throughput for the sake of interactivity, which
> is what the interactivity patches do anyhow. This is a reasonable
> compromise.

That's not as silly as it sounds. In fact it should be dead easy to
increase/decrease the amount of anticipatory time based on the bonus from
looking at the code. I dunno how the higher filesystem gods feel about this


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.150 / U:1.708 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site