[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] O10int for interactivity wrote:

> I'm guessing that the anticipatory scheduler is the culprit here. Soon as I figure
> out the incantations to use the deadline scheduler, I'll report back....

It would be unfortunate if AS and the interactivity scheduler were to
conflict. Is there a way we can have them talk to each other and have
AS boost some I/O requests for tasks which are marked as interactive?

It would sacrifice some throughput for the sake of interactivity, which
is what the interactivity patches do anyhow. This is a reasonable

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.159 / U:1.568 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site