Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:52:28 -0800 | From | Aaron Lehmann <> | Subject | Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? |
| |
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 05:34:58PM -0500, Rob Wilkens wrote: > You're wrong. You wouldn't have to jump over them any more than you > have to jump over the "goto" statement.
The goto is a conditional jump. You propose replacing it with a conditional jump past the error handling code predicated on the opposite condition. Where's the improvement?
> > any instructions, and you end up with a kernel which has much more > > duplicated code and thus thrashes the cache more. It also makes the > > If that argument was taken to it's logical conclusion (and I did, in my > mind just now), no one should add any code the grows the kernel at all.
Not without good reason. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |