lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
From

<quote who="Rob Wilkens">
> On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:52, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 05:34:58PM -0500, Rob Wilkens wrote:
>> > You're wrong. You wouldn't have to jump over them any more than you have to jump
>> over the "goto" statement.
>>
>> The goto is a conditional jump. You propose replacing it with a
>> conditional jump past the error handling code predicated on the
>> opposite condition. Where's the improvement?
>
> The goto is absolutely not a conditional jump. The if that precedes it is
> conditional. The goto is not. The if is already there.
>
> -Rob


Oh my God ... really you are the only one on this list not to understand that hi has
mispelled ?!?

Now I understand the reason of your trollness !!

--
Emiliano Gabrielli

dip. di Fisica
2° Università di Roma "Tor Vergata"


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.082 / U:4.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site