Messages in this thread |  | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: [2.5] DAC960 | Date | Sun, 15 Sep 2002 18:20:09 +0200 |
| |
On Sunday 15 September 2002 17:14, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sun, 2002-09-15 at 05:21, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > A somewhat curt reply, it could be seen as a brush-off. I believe the > > whole story goes something like this: the scsi system is a festering > > sore on the whole and eventually needs to be rationalized. But until > > that happens, we should basically just keep nursing along the various > > drivers that should be using a generic interface, until there really > > is a generic interface around worth putting in the effort to port to. > > DAC960 doesn't present a scsi interface to the higher levels. Its > abstraction truely is block based, like i2o_block, like aacraid, like > many other cards.
Yup, brainlock, I knew that. Just bracketing the target...
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |