[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [2.5] DAC960
On Sunday 15 September 2002 17:14, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-09-15 at 05:21, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > A somewhat curt reply, it could be seen as a brush-off. I believe the
> > whole story goes something like this: the scsi system is a festering
> > sore on the whole and eventually needs to be rationalized. But until
> > that happens, we should basically just keep nursing along the various
> > drivers that should be using a generic interface, until there really
> > is a generic interface around worth putting in the effort to port to.
> DAC960 doesn't present a scsi interface to the higher levels. Its
> abstraction truely is block based, like i2o_block, like aacraid, like
> many other cards.

Yup, brainlock, I knew that. Just bracketing the target...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.086 / U:2.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site