Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [2.5] DAC960 | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 15 Sep 2002 16:14:50 +0100 |
| |
On Sun, 2002-09-15 at 05:21, Daniel Phillips wrote: > A somewhat curt reply, it could be seen as a brush-off. I believe the > whole story goes something like this: the scsi system is a festering > sore on the whole and eventually needs to be rationalized. But until > that happens, we should basically just keep nursing along the various > drivers that should be using a generic interface, until there really > is a generic interface around worth putting in the effort to port to.
DAC960 doesn't present a scsi interface to the higher levels. Its abstraction truely is block based, like i2o_block, like aacraid, like many other cards.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |