Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 Sep 2002 19:52:51 +0200 | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Subject | Re: XFS? |
| |
At 09:55 AM 9/11/2002 -0500, Shawn wrote: >Which is why I pointed out that the issue at hand was not regarding the >everything else, but in fact the actual filesystem support.
I was just trying to say that everything _appears_ to be on track from my (remote) perspective. I've noticed no gripes from the XFS team, only evidence that development continues. If there are 6 lines of generic code changes left, that means a lot has happened.
>As far as why the rest is still pending, I was just offering ideas. > >A lot of this thread is advocacy as opposed to substantive conversation >about the how and/or why/why not of inclusion of XFS into mainline.
Advocacy without technical meat sucks.
>Fankly, there is no /real/ answer except "Linus has not weighed in on >the current question".
Hey, maybe he's trying to convince (blackmail;) them to port some bandwidth guarantee stuff ;))))) (I hope that's enough smilies)
>I lost my ability to invest emotions in either side of huge kernel >debates when the devfs and lvm wars happened.
I love it when the heavyweights square off (oooo:). Unfortunately, that often leads to a bunch of dipsticks hollering "food fight!" ;-)
-Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |