Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 07 Apr 2002 16:51:36 +0200 | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.0 is available |
| |
Hi,
Keith Owens wrote:
> >These 14 seconds (or 37 seconds on my machine) are always needed > >whatever I try, e.g. "make foo/bar.o" also needs that time. > > make NO_MAKEFILE_GEN=1 foo/bar.o. Very low overhead for quick and > dirty testing of changes, but if you want an accurate kernel build, you > have to take the overhead. kbuild 2.4 overhead for a full build when > only minor changes have been made is even worse.
I don't want a kernel build, I just want a single object file to be rebuilt?! I can understand that it takes longer, when I change a Makefile or the config, but why has the Makefile to be rebuilt, when only a source file changed?
bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |