[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.0 is available

Keith Owens wrote:

>It takes time to do all the analysis to work out what has changed and
>what has been affected. You might know that you only changed one file
>but kernel build and make don't know that until they have checked
>everything. Changing one file or specifying a command override might
>affect one file or it might affect the entire kernel.
>If you know that you have only changed one source file and you have not
>altered the Makefiles or the dependency chain in any way, then it
>_might_ be safe to just rebuild that one file, use NO_MAKEFILE_GEN=1.
>Otherwise let kbuild work out what has been affected.
Humans/Hackers are really really REALLY good at making assumptions and
using assumptions that are outdated, thus leading to mistakes.
Some/many hackers like to live in there own little world and not worry
about the effect they might have on other developers. Using a
dependency maintenance tool (such as Make, Cook, ...) to automate the
build is the _ONLY_ safe way to be sure the build is correct. This
assumes that the build system itself is 100% correct :)

Brendan Simon.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.050 / U:1.780 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site