Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:10:11 -0400 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... |
| |
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 05:50:25PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Monday 22 April 2002 17:44, Larry McVoy wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 02:53:13PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > I hope I made it clear that I believe BK is helping Linux. Furthermore, I > > > don't see why Larry should not collect some advertising for his contribution. > > > Within limits. IMHO, we're on the wrong side of the limit at the moment, > > > and moving further with no sign of moderating. > > > > Yes, because so many purchasing managers spend their time reading the > > Documentation subdirectory of the Linux kernel in order to decide what > > SCM system they should use. > > > > The existence (or non-existence) of the docs has absolutely no marketing > > value to BK. > > So you have no problem with moving them to a website, leaving a url in > SubmittingPatches?
Do you have a problem with moving other docs out to Websites, which are describing closed-spec hardware? Such hardware (and their vendors) are actively anti-open source, yet we have documents describing those, too.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |