[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    SubjectRe: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...
    On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 05:50:25PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > > The existence (or non-existence) of the docs has absolutely no marketing
    > > value to BK.
    > So you have no problem with moving them to a website, leaving a url in
    > SubmittingPatches?

    It's not my call to make. Take it up with the people who own the tree.

    Personally, I think a patch like this is more of what you need:

    ===== bk-kernel-howto.txt 1.2 vs edited =====
    --- 1.2/Documentation/BK-usage/bk-kernel-howto.txt Fri Mar 15 09:08:54 2002
    +++ edited/bk-kernel-howto.txt Mon Apr 22 09:04:26 2002
    @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
    +To placate some pedantic people who feel that this document is an
    +advertisement, the name of the source management system has been
    +replaced with "groovy SCM".

    - Doing the BK Thing, Penguin-Style
    + Doing the groovy SCM Thing, Penguin-Style

    @@ -11,48 +15,48 @@
    Due to the author's background, an operation may be described in terms
    of CVS, or in terms of how that operation differs from CVS.

    -This is -not- intended to be BitKeeper documentation. Always run
    +This is -not- intended to be groovy SCM documentation. Always run
    "bk help <command>" or in X "bk helptool <command>" for reference

    -BitKeeper Concepts
    +groovy SCM Concepts


    Larry McVoy lm at
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.024 / U:11.828 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site