[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ?

    > Davide> i still have pieces of paper on my desk about tests done on
    > Davide> my dual piii where by hacking HZ to 1000 the kernel build
    > Davide> time went from an average of 2min:30sec to an average
    > Davide> 2min:43sec. that is pretty close to 10%
    > The last time I measured timer tick overhead on ia64 it was well below
    > 1% of overhead. I don't really like using kernel builds as a
    > benchmark, because there are far too many variables for the results to
    > have any long-term or cross-platform value. But since it's popular, I
    > did measure it quickly on a relatively slow (old) Itanium box: with
    > 100Hz, the kernel compile was about 0.6% faster than with 1024Hz
    > (2.4.18 UP kernel).

    .5% still looks like a lot to me. Good compiler optimization is .5% on

    And think what it does with old 386sx.. Maybe time for those "tick on demand"
    Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
    details at

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.023 / U:0.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site