lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ?
>>>>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 10:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> said:

Davide> i still have pieces of paper on my desk about tests done on
Davide> my dual piii where by hacking HZ to 1000 the kernel build
Davide> time went from an average of 2min:30sec to an average
Davide> 2min:43sec. that is pretty close to 10%

The last time I measured timer tick overhead on ia64 it was well below
1% of overhead. I don't really like using kernel builds as a
benchmark, because there are far too many variables for the results to
have any long-term or cross-platform value. But since it's popular, I
did measure it quickly on a relatively slow (old) Itanium box: with
100Hz, the kernel compile was about 0.6% faster than with 1024Hz
(2.4.18 UP kernel).

--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:2.009 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site