[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ?
    On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 20:49, David Mosberger wrote:

    > But since it's popular, I did measure it quickly on a relatively
    > slow (old) Itanium box: with 100Hz, the kernel compile was about
    > 0.6% faster than with 1024Hz (2.4.18 UP kernel).

    One question I have always had is why 1024 and not 1000 ?

    Because that is what Alpha does? It seems to me there is no reason for
    a power-of-two timer value, and using 1024 vs 1000 just makes the math
    and rounding more difficult.

    Robert Love

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.047 / U:2.388 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site