Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 06 Mar 2002 16:07:29 -0500 | From | Chris Friesen <> | Subject | Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers |
| |
Mark Mielke wrote:
> If BK meets all the requirements, and no other product does, then don't > give it a second thought, or a second post. I don't know what BK offers, > but I do know that products such as ClearCase are *significantly* more > useful, and usable than CVS.
Just wanted to throw in my two cents. I dislike clearcase. It's dog slow, doesn't support atomic updates of multiple files, and is generally a pain in the butt to use.
Unfortunately, its the official versioning system at work and all new projects are strongly encouraged to use it.
-- Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10 Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557 3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986 Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |