[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Possible breakthrough in the CML2 logjam?
Larry McVoy <>:
> > I need you to tell Linus that your concerns have been met
> > and sponsor CML2 to go in, so I can stop perpetually re-fighting old
> > battles.
> That's a fine thing for anyone and everyone to say *after* they have
> used the system and like it.
> If you are asking for a blessing in advance, which is how I read that,
> I would think there is zero chance of that happening, it's not how work
> is done on the kernel.

We're talking about design objections here. Specific objections to actual
CML2 bugs, including rulebase and UI bugs, are a different level. What
I am asking is if Jeff will bless the *architecture* provided the global-
dependency issue is met.
<a href="">Eric S. Raymond</a>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.171 / U:2.868 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site