Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 16 Feb 2002 12:16:34 -0500 | From | "Eric S. Raymond" <> | Subject | Re: Possible breakthrough in the CML2 logjam? |
| |
Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>: > > I need you to tell Linus that your concerns have been met > > and sponsor CML2 to go in, so I can stop perpetually re-fighting old > > battles. > > That's a fine thing for anyone and everyone to say *after* they have > used the system and like it. > > If you are asking for a blessing in advance, which is how I read that, > I would think there is zero chance of that happening, it's not how work > is done on the kernel.
We're talking about design objections here. Specific objections to actual CML2 bugs, including rulebase and UI bugs, are a different level. What I am asking is if Jeff will bless the *architecture* provided the global- dependency issue is met. -- <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |