Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:49:25 +0400 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1 |
| |
Hans Reiser wrote:
> Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote: > >> This is the stupidiest testcase I've done but it worth seeing (maybe) >> >> We create 300000 files named from 00000000 to 000493E0 in one >> directory, then delete it in order. >> >> Tests taken on ext3+htree and reiserfs. ext3 w/o htree hadn't >> evaluated because it will take long long time ... >> >> both filesystems was mounted with noatime,nodiratime and ext3 was >> data=writeback to be somewhat fair ... >> >> real user sys >> reiserfs: >> Creating: 3m13.208s 0m4.412s 2m54.404s >> Deleting: 4m41.250s 0m4.206s 4m17.926s >> >> Ext3: >> Creating: 4m9.331s 0m3.927s 2m21.757s >> Deleting: 9m14.838s 0m3.446s 1m39.508s >> >> htree improved this a much but it still beaten by reiserfs. seems odd >> to me - deleting taking twice time then creating ... >> >> >> > Can you send us the code so we can try it on reiser4? We are going to > release reiser4 sometime this month (don't ask me when), and we'd be > happy to see you run it when you do.
^you^we
Sorry to list for bandwidth waste.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |