[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1
    Paul P Komkoff Jr writes:
    > This is the stupidiest testcase I've done but it worth seeing (maybe)
    > We create 300000 files named from 00000000 to 000493E0 in one
    > directory, then delete it in order.
    > Tests taken on ext3+htree and reiserfs. ext3 w/o htree hadn't
    > evaluated because it will take long long time ...
    > both filesystems was mounted with noatime,nodiratime and ext3 was
    > data=writeback to be somewhat fair ...
    > real user sys
    > reiserfs:
    > Creating: 3m13.208s 0m4.412s 2m54.404s
    > Deleting: 4m41.250s 0m4.206s 4m17.926s
    > Ext3:
    > Creating: 4m9.331s 0m3.927s 2m21.757s
    > Deleting: 9m14.838s 0m3.446s 1m39.508s

    Why user times are so different?

    > htree improved this a much but it still beaten by reiserfs. seems odd
    > to me - deleting taking twice time then creating ...
    > --
    > Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff 'Greatest' Jr /// (icq)23200764 /// (http)
    > When you're invisible, the only one really watching you is you (my keychain)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.020 / U:3.648 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site