[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux 2.4.8-ac10
I hope you don't mind if I post this to l-k so Alan (and everyone), can
see (what a fool I am).

On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Pete Zaitcev wrote:

> Curious. Did you keep the dmesg and ksymoops output?

I didn't, but they probally aren't important at this point. I got
2.4.8-ac10 to boot. I was going to build a kernel that oopsed, so I went
to reverse off the -ac10 patch, but patch asked me to ignore the -R. I
was like, crap, I just build a plain 2.4.8. No wonder it wouldn't boot, I
didn't have ext2 built in.

Sorry for your time, and thanks for making me think this through again.

I'll repeat, 2.4.8-ac10 is cool for me now.

(And I got the college dorms online, that have been distracting me all
week, so I can think straight again. :)

Two penguins were walking on an iceberg. The first penguin said to the
second, "you look like you are wearing a tuxedo." The second penguin
said, "I might be..." --David Lynch, Twin Peaks

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:58    [W:0.037 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site