lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Bounce buffer deadlock


On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Steve Lord wrote:
>
> >
> > Has anyone else seen a hang like this:
> >
> > bdflush()
> > flush_dirty_buffers()
> > ll_rw_block()
> > submit_bh(buffer X)
> > generic_make_request()
> > __make_request()
> > create_bounce()
> > alloc_bounce_page()
> > alloc_page()
> > try_to_free_pages()
> > do_try_to_free_pages()
> > page_launder()
> > try_to_free_buffers( , 2) -- i.e. wait for buffers
> > sync_page_buffers()
> > __wait_on_buffer(buffer X)
> >
> > Where the buffer head X going in the top of the stack is the same as the one
> > we wait on at the bottom.
> >
> > There still seems to be nothing to prevent the try to free buffers from
> > blocking on a buffer like this. Setting a flag on the buffer around the
> > create_bounce call, and skipping it in the try_to_free_buffers path would
> > be one approach to avoiding this.
>
> Yes there is a bug: Linus is going to put a new fix soon.
>
> > I hit this in 2.4.6-pre6, and I don't see anything in the ac series to protect
> > against it.
>
> Thats because the -ac series does not contain the __GFP_BUFFER/__GFP_IO
> moditications which are in the -ac series.
^^

I mean 2.4.6-pre, sorry.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.071 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site