[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Bounce buffer deadlock
    > On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Steve Lord wrote:
    > >
    > > It looks to me as if all memory allocations of type GFP_BUFFER which happen
    > > in generic_make_request downwards can hit the same type of deadlock, so
    > > bounce buffers, the request functions of the raid and lvm paths can all
    > > end up in try_to_free_buffers on a buffer they themselves hold the lock on.
    > .. which is why GFP_BUFFER doesn't exist any more in the most recent
    > pre-kernels (oops, this is pre8 only, not pre7 like I said in the previous
    > email)
    > The problem is that GFP_BUFFER used to mean two things: "don't call
    > low-level filesystem" and "don't do IO". Some of the pre-kernels starting
    > to make it mean "don't call low-level FS" only. The later ones split up
    > the semantics, so that the cases which care about FS deadlocks use
    > "GFP_NOFS", and the cases that care about IO recursion use "GFP_NOIO", so
    > that we don't overload the meaning of GFP_BUFFER.
    > That allows us to do the best we can - still flushing out dirty buffers
    > when that's ok (like when a filesystem wants more memory), and giving the
    > allocator better control over exactly _what_ he objects to.
    > Linus

    OK, sounds reasonable, time to go download and merge again I guess!


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.035 / U:0.612 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site