[lkml]   [2001]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock removal, balancing & cleanup

On Fri, 25 May 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So I think I'll buy some experimentation. That HIGHMEM change is
> > too ugly to live, though, I'd really like to hear more about why
> > something that ugly is necessary.
> If you mean the "GFP_BUFFER allocations should fail instead
> of looping forever" thing, it is because:

No, I was thinking more of the dirty buffer balancing thing.

It seems to have this hardcoded notion of "DMA + NORMAL", which is just
wrong. There could be more zones that are acceptable to buffers, so what
it _should_ do is to just walk the zone list that GFP_BUFFER points to.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:54    [W:0.148 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site