[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.5.2-pre2 forces ramfs on

On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Legacy Fishtank wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 03:04:40PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Because it's small, and if it wasn't there, we'd have to have the small
> > > "rootfs" anyway (which basically duplicated ramfs functionality).
> >
> > Can ramfs=N longer term actually come back to be "use __init for the RAM
> > fs functions". That would seem to address any space issues even the most
> > embedded fanatic has.
> Nifty idea... We could use __rootfs or similar in the module.

Um, folks - rootfs does _not_ go away after you mount final root over it.
Having absolute root always there makes life much simpler in a lot of

What's more, quite a few ramfs methods are good candidates for library
functions, since they are already shared with other filesystems and
number of such cases is going to grow.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:1.006 / U:2.888 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site