[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.5.2-pre2 forces ramfs on
> Because it's small, and if it wasn't there, we'd have to have the small
> "rootfs" anyway (which basically duplicated ramfs functionality).

Can ramfs=N longer term actually come back to be "use __init for the RAM
fs functions". That would seem to address any space issues even the most
embedded fanatic has.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.106 / U:1.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site