Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 26 Dec 2001 12:20:44 -0500 | From | Legacy Fishtank <> | Subject | Re: 2.5.2-pre2 forces ramfs on |
| |
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 03:04:40PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > Because it's small, and if it wasn't there, we'd have to have the small > > "rootfs" anyway (which basically duplicated ramfs functionality). > > Can ramfs=N longer term actually come back to be "use __init for the RAM > fs functions". That would seem to address any space issues even the most > embedded fanatic has.
Nifty idea... We could use __rootfs or similar in the module.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |