Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:35:12 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: Which gcc version? |
| |
Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > At 20:14 23/11/01, Andrew Morton wrote: > >Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > > > If there is a performance hit, it's not enough to worry about. > > > >except egcs-1.1.2 (2.91.6) compiles stuff at almost twice the speed > >of gcc3. The person who breaks egcs-1.1.2 for kernel builds owes > >me a quad Xeon, thanks very much. > > Have you read the current Documentation/Changes? It says "the 2.5 tree is > likely to drop egcs-1.1.2 workarounds". Whoever wrote that seems to be > wanting to break it in the near future...
Well that's great news. To whom do I send my shipping address?
Actually, I have negligible interest in working on something which won't be useful to real people for three years, so that works out, doesn't it?
- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |