[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Which gcc version?
Hi Andrew,

At 20:14 23/11/01, Andrew Morton wrote:
>Daniel Phillips wrote:
> >
> > If there is a performance hit, it's not enough to worry about.
>except egcs-1.1.2 (2.91.6) compiles stuff at almost twice the speed
>of gcc3. The person who breaks egcs-1.1.2 for kernel builds owes
>me a quad Xeon, thanks very much.

Have you read the current Documentation/Changes? It says "the 2.5 tree is
likely to drop egcs-1.1.2 workarounds". Whoever wrote that seems to be
wanting to break it in the near future...


"I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at> (replace at with @)
Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW:
ICQ: 8561279 / WWW:

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.057 / U:19.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site